Point image restoration device and method

ABSTRACT

Provided are an image processing device, an imaging device, and an image processing method which are capable of obtaining a captured image with desired image quality. An image processing unit functioning as an image processing device includes a point image restoration processing unit that performs point image restoration processing using a restoration filter based on a point spread function of a lens unit on image data obtained from an imaging element through imaging of a subject using an imaging unit having a lens unit including a lens and the imaging element, and a determination unit that determines whether or not to perform the point image restoration processing using the point image restoration processing unit based on spherical aberration of the lens changed by an imaging condition. The point image restoration processing unit performs the point image restoration processing only in a case where the determination unit determines to perform the point image restoration processing.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a Continuation of PCT InternationalApplication No. PCT/JP2017/006420 filed on Feb. 21, 2017 claimingpriority under 35 U.S.C § 119(a) to Japanese Patent Application No.2016-036197 filed on Feb. 26, 2016. Each of the above applications ishereby expressly incorporated by reference, in their entirety, into thepresent application.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an image processing device, an imagingdevice, and an image processing method, and particularly, to atechnology that performs restoration processing of an image capturedthrough an imaging optical system based on a point spread function ofthe imaging optical system.

2. Description of the Related Art

There are some cases where a point spread phenomenon in which a pointsubject minutely spreads is seen on a subject image captured through animaging optical system due to the influence of aberration anddiffraction caused by the imaging optical system. A function indicatinga response to a point light source of the imaging optical system iscalled a point spread function (PSF), and is known as characteristicsfor influencing resolution degradation (blur) of a captured image.

Point image restoration processing based on the PSF is performed on thecaptured image of which image quality is degraded due to the pointspread phenomenon, and thus, it is possible to restore (recover) theimage quality of the degraded captured image. The point imagerestoration processing is processing in which degradationcharacteristics (point image characteristics) caused by the aberrationof the imaging optical system (lens and diaphragm) are obtained inadvance and the point spreading of the captured image is canceled orreduced through image processing using a restoration filtercorresponding to the point image characteristics.

In the related art, an imaging device that performs such point imagerestoration processing is described in JP2014-150423A.

Even in a case where aberration such as spherical aberration, comaaberration, field curvature, or astigmatism of the imaging opticalsystem is corrected with high accuracy, the captured image obtained bythe imaging device is degraded due to a diffraction phenomenon dependingon an F number and the aberration is able to be enhanced by improvingimage forming performance of the imaging optical system. In this regard,JP2014-150423A describes the importance of correcting the degradation ofthe image due to the diffraction since diffraction is an unavoidablephysical phenomenon.

JP2014-150423A describes that the aberration is reduced by the diaphragmat an F number of F16 or more and the influence of the diffractionbecomes dominant.

Thus, the imaging device described in JP2014-150423A uses only thediffraction (so-called small diaphragm blur) occurring in a case wherethe F number is equal to or greater than a predetermined value (smalldiaphragm) as a target of the point image restoration processing, andperforms the point image restoration processing of the captured image byusing one restoration filter corresponding to the F number in a casewhere the F number at the time of imaging the captured image is equal toor greater than the predetermined value.

Since the small diaphragm blur depends on the F number and thewavelength of the light and does not depend on an image height (aposition of the image), it is possible to reduce the small diaphragmblur by using one restoration filter within one image, and thus, it ispossible to reduce the data amount and the operation amount.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Since the imaging device described in JP2014-150423A uses only the smalldiaphragm blur as the target of the point image restoration processing,it is difficult to recover the degradation of the image quality causedby the spherical aberration of the imaging optical system, particularly,high spherical aberration of light rays passing through a region near anouter edge of a pupil. Accordingly, it is necessary to use the imagingoptical system which causes less degradation in the image quality causedby the spherical aberration as the imaging optical system applied to theimaging device described in JP2014-150423A, and there is a problem thatthe imaging optical system becomes expensive.

The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, andan object of the present invention is to provide an image processingdevice, an imaging device, and an image processing method which arecapable of obtaining the captured image with desired image quality.

In order to achieve the object, an image processing device according toan aspect of the present invention comprises a point image restorationprocessing unit that performs point image restoration processing using arestoration filter based on a point spread function of an imagingoptical system on image data obtained from an imaging element throughimaging of a subject using an imaging unit having the imaging opticalsystem and the imaging element, and a determination unit that determineswhether or not to perform the point image restoration processing usingthe point image restoration processing unit based on sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system changed by an imagingcondition. The point image restoration processing unit performs thepoint image restoration processing only in a case where thedetermination unit determines to perform the point image restorationprocessing.

The image quality of the captured image mainly depends on the sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system, but the spherical aberrationof the imaging optical system is changed by the imaging condition. Thedetermination unit determines whether or not to perform the point imagerestoration processing using the point image restoration processing unitbased on the spherical aberration of the imaging optical system changedby the imaging condition. Since the point image restoration processingunit performs the point image restoration processing only in a casewhere the determination unit determines to perform the point imagerestoration processing, it is possible to restore (recover) the degradedcaptured image to the captured image with the desired image quality.Since the point image restoration processing unit performs the pointimage restoration processing only in a case where the determination unitdetermines to perform the point image restoration processing, it ispossible to reduce the data amount of the restoration filter used in thepoint image restoration processing and the operational costs of thepoint image restoration processing.

In the image processing device according to another aspect of thepresent invention, the imaging condition is an F number of a diaphragmconstituting the imaging optical system. The spherical aberration of theimaging optical system is changed by the F number of the diaphragm.Accordingly, the F number of the diaphragm is one of the imagingconditions for changing the spherical aberration.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that the determination unitdetermines whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing using the point image restoration processing unit based onthe F number of the diaphragm. The determination unit indirectlydetermines whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing using the point image restoration processing unit by usingthe F number of the diaphragm which is one of parameters for changingthe spherical aberration.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where the sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system changed by the imagingcondition is equal to or greater than a first threshold value, thedetermination unit determines to perform the point image restorationprocessing using the point image restoration processing unit.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where a wavelengthfor determining the spherical aberration is λ, the first threshold valueis 0.6λ.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where a ratio ofsecond spherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by theimaging condition to first spherical aberration of the imaging opticalsystem in a case where a diaphragm constituting the imaging opticalsystem is an full aperture exceeds to a second threshold value, thedetermination unit determines to perform the point image restorationprocessing using the point image restoration processing unit.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that the second threshold value is0.5.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, the imaging condition is a kind of a light sourcethat illuminates the subject or a wavelength of the light source. Thespherical aberration of the imaging optical system is changed by thewavelength, and thus, the kind of the light source that illuminates thesubject is one of the imaging conditions for changing the sphericalaberration.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that the determination unit uses thespherical aberration corresponding to the kind of the light source thatilluminates the subject or the wavelength of the light source, as thespherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by theimaging condition. The reason is that the wavelength (the wavelength ofthe light source specified by the kind of the light source) of the lightsource is one of the parameters for changing the spherical aberration.

In the image processing device according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where the diaphragmconstituting the imaging optical system is at least an full aperture,the imaging optical system has the spherical aberration at which thedetermination unit determines to perform the point image restorationprocessing. The imaging optical system having spherical aberration atwhich the point image restoration is needed in a case where thediaphragm is the full aperture is employed as the imaging opticalsystem. Thus, it is possible to achieve a cheap imaging optical systemwith high degree of freedom of optical design compared with the imagingoptical system designed such that the point image restoration is notneeded even in a case where the diaphragm is the full aperture.

An imaging device according to still another aspect of the presentinvention comprises any of the above-described image processing devices,and the imaging unit.

In the imaging device according to still another aspect of the presentinvention, it is preferable that the imaging device is used as anindustrial camera.

An image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention comprises a step of performing point image restorationprocessing using a restoration filter based on a point spread functionof an imaging optical system on image data obtained from an imagingelement through imaging of a subject using an imaging unit having theimaging optical system and the imaging element, and a step ofdetermining whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing based on spherical aberration of the imaging optical systemchanged by an imaging condition. In the step of performing the pointimage restoration processing, the point image restoration processingusing a restoration filter is performed only in a case where it isdetermined to perform the point image restoration processing in the stepof determining whether or not to perform the image point restorationprocessing.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that the imaging condition is an Fnumber of a diaphragm constituting the imaging optical system.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in the step of determiningwhether or not to perform the point image restoration processing, it isdetermined to whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing based on the F number of the diaphragm.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where the sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system changed by the imagingcondition is equal to or greater than a first threshold value, it isdetermined to perform the point image restoration processing in the stepof determining whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where a wavelengthfor determining the spherical aberration is λ, the first threshold valueis 0.6λ.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that in a case where a ratio ofsecond spherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by theimaging condition to first spherical aberration of the imaging opticalsystem in a case where a diaphragm constituting the imaging opticalsystem is an full aperture exceeds to a second threshold value, it isdetermined to perform the point image restoration processing in the stepof determining whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing.

In the image processing method according to still another aspect of thepresent invention, it is preferable that the second threshold value is0.5.

According to the present invention, since it is determined whether ornot to perform the point image restoration processing based on thespherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by theimaging condition and the point image restoration processing isperformed only in a case where it is determined to perform the pointimage restoration processing, it is possible to restore (recover) thedegraded captured image to the captured image with the desired imagequality. In a case where it is determined not to perform the point imagerestoration processing, since the captured image with the desired imagequality is obtained and the point image restoration processing is notperformed, it is possible to reduce the data amount of the restorationfilter used in the point image restoration processing and theoperational costs of the point image restoration processing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration example ofan imaging device connected to a computer.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a configuration example of a cameracontroller shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a first embodiment of an imageprocessing unit in the camera controller shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 4 is a chart showing an example of an MTF calculated for eachcombination of spherical aberration and an F number.

FIG. 5 is a chart showing another example showing the MTF calculated foreach combination of the spherical aberration and the F number.

FIG. 6 is a longitudinal aberration diagram showing the sphericalaberration of the lens.

FIG. 7 is a chart showing a calculation result of the sphericalaberration ratio calculated for each lens having different sphericalaberration shown in FIG. 4.

FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a second embodiment of the imageprocessing unit in the camera controller shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a first embodiment of an image processingmethod.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a second embodiment of the imageprocessing method.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing a third embodiment of the imageprocessing method.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, embodiments of an image processing device, an imagingdevice, and an image processing method according to the presentinvention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.In the following embodiments, an example in which the present inventionis applied to an imaging device used in a machine vision system will bedescribed.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration example ofan imaging device 10 connected to a computer (PC: personal computer).

An industrial camera needs to image an image on which a target range isin focus with high speed by decreasing an F number of a diaphragm whileincreasing depth of field, and hardly uses the F number at which smalldiaphragm blur may occur like a general camera lens.

The imaging device 10 shown in FIG. 1 is an industrial camera used inthe machine vision system, and mainly includes a lens unit 12 and animaging element 26 which constitute an imaging unit, a camera controller28, an input and output interface 32, and an illumination device 40.

The lens unit 12 includes an imaging optical system that includes a lens16 and a diaphragm 18, and an optical system operating unit 20 thatcontrols the imaging optical system. The optical system operating unit20 includes a manual operating unit that adjusts a focus position of thelens 16, and a diaphragm driving unit that drives the diaphragm 18 inresponse to a control signal applied from the camera controller 28.

It is important that lens performance such as resolution and brightnessis homogeneous in a plane for the lens of the imaging device used in themachine vision system. An F number of the diaphragm is restricted asdesign means for realizing the in-plane lens performance, but thebrightness of the lens is needed as a lens specification.

Meanwhile, it is common for the imaging device used in the machinevision system to use a diaphragm having a mid-range (a diaphragm havingan F number range which is larger than an F number of an full apertureand is smaller than an F number of a small diaphragm at which smalldiaphragm blur occurs) as a range of the diaphragm for practical use dueto the necessity of a depth of field.

Accordingly, the lens 16 of the imaging device 10 is preferentiallydesigned such that a captured image with desired image quality needed inthe inspection, measurement, or positioning of a product is able to beobtained under a predetermined imaging condition (including the F numberof the diaphragm for practical use) on the preferential basis. The imagequality of the captured image obtained by using the lens 16 is degradedunder an imaging condition other than the predetermined imagingcondition, and does not satisfy the desired image quality (becomes thedegraded captured image). However, it is possible to restore (recover)the degraded captured image through point image restoration processingto be described below. A focal length (f) of the lens 16 of the presentexample is f=16 mm.

The diaphragm 18 includes a plurality of diaphragm leaf blades, and iscontrolled at ten steps from F1.4 (maximum F number) to F22 in one-AV(aperture value) increments.

The imaging element 26 is a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor(CMOS) type image sensor. The imaging element 26 is not limited to theCMOS type, and may be an XY address type or charge coupled device (CCD)type image sensor. A sampling frequency (fs) of the imaging element 26of the present example is 90 samples/mm.

The illumination device 40 illuminates a subject in a region in whichimaging is performed by the imaging device 10, and includes, forexample, a plurality of light sources such as a mercury lamp, aninfrared light source, and RGB light sources of red (R), green (G), andblue (B). The illumination device illuminates the subject withillumination light having a desired wavelength by selecting the kind ofthe light source that emits light. In the present example, theillumination device 40 can emit light by appropriately selecting lighthaving a spectrum (wavelength λ=546.070 nm) of e lines as a peakwavelength by turning on the mercury lamp or infrared light having awavelength (1092.14 nm) which is two times the wavelength of the e linesas a peak wavelength by turning on the infrared light source. It ispossible to emit light having a desired peak wavelength by turning onelight source selected from the RGB light sources or a light sourceappropriately combined from the RGB light sources.

Although the details will be described below, the camera controller 28has a function of a device controller 34 that generally controls theunits of the imaging device 10 and a function of an image processingunit (image processing device) 35 that performs image processing onimage data sent from the imaging element 26, as shown in FIG. 2.

Image data on which the image processing is performed by the cameracontroller 28 is sent to a computer 60 or the like through the input andoutput interface 32. A format of the image data output from the cameracontroller 28 is not particularly limited, and may be a format such asthe Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) or an H.264 in the case of amotion picture and a format such as the Joint Photographic Experts Group(JPEG) or Tagged Image File Format (TIFF) in the case of a still image.Raw data on which the image processing is not performed by the imageprocessing unit 35 may be output. The camera controller 28 may generateone image file like a so-called Exchangeable image file format (Exif) byassociating a plurality of relevant data items such as headerinformation (imaging date and time, camera model, number of pixels, Fnumber, kind of light source, or the like), main image data, andthumbnail image data with each other, and may output the image file.

The computer 60 is a portion constituting a part of the machine visionsystem that inspects various products. The computer is connected to theimaging device 10 through the input and output interface 32 of theimaging device 10 and a computer input and output unit 62, and receivesdata items such as the image data sent from the imaging device 10. Acomputer controller 64 generally controls the computer 60, performs theimage processing on the image data from the imaging device 10, inspectsthe captured product, and controls communication with various devices(not shown) such as an industrial robot connected via a network.

The computer 60 has a display 66, and displays the processing contentand inspection result in the computer controller 64 on the display 66 ifnecessary. A user can input data or a command to the computer controller64 by operating input means (not shown) such as a keyboard whilechecking the display of the display 66. Accordingly, the user cancontrol the computer 60 or the imaging device 10 connected to thecomputer 60.

The controllers (camera controller 28 and computer controller 64) eachhave circuits needed in control processing, and includes, for example, acentral processing unit (CPU).

[Image Processing Device]

<First Embodiment of Image Processing Unit>

FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a first embodiment of the imageprocessing unit 35 within the camera controller 28 shown in FIG. 2.

The image processing unit 35 shown in FIG. 3 mainly includes a pointimage restoration processing unit 51, a determination unit 53, and achangeover unit (changeover switch) 54. The image processing unit 35includes various processing units of an offset processing, gradationcorrection processing, and outline emphasis processing in addition tothe point image restoration processing unit 51, but these processingunits are not shown in FIG. 3.

Image data which is read out from the imaging element 26 (FIG. 1) and isconverted into a digital signal is applied to a first input 54A of thechangeover switch 54 and the point image restoration processing unit 51(restoration filter processing unit 51A).

The point image restoration processing unit 51 mainly includes therestoration filter processing unit 51A, a restoration filter storageunit 51B, and a restoration filter selecting unit 51C.

Image data on which restoration processing is not performed yet, thatis, image data of a captured image of which image quality is degradeddue to spherical aberration of the lens 16 is applied to one input ofthe restoration filter processing unit 51A, and a restoration filterwhich is appropriately selected from a plurality of restoration filtersstored in the restoration filter storage unit 51B by the restorationfilter selecting unit 51C is applied to the other input.

The restoration filter processing unit 51A performs the point imagerestoration processing using the restoration filter applied by therestoration filter selecting unit 51C on the input image data, andcalculates the image data on which the point image restorationprocessing is performed. That is, the restoration filter processing unit51A calculates image data obtained by performing the point imagerestoration processing by performing a convolution operation of imagedata having a predetermined kernel size (which is the same kernel sizeas that of the restoration filter, and is, for example, 7×7) with aprocessing target pixel of the input image data as a center and therestoration filter.

The image data on which the point image restoration processing isperformed by the restoration filter processing unit 51A is applied to asecond input 54B of the changeover switch 54.

The determination unit 53 is a portion that determines whether or not itis necessary to perform the point image restoration processing on theinput image data by the point image restoration processing unit 51. In acase where it is determined that it is necessary to perform the pointimage restoration processing, the determination unit is a portion thatoutputs a changeover signal (for example, a high-level signal) forchanging a movable portion 54C of the changeover switch 54 to the secondinput 54B. In a case where it is determined that it is not necessary toperform the point image restoration processing, the determination unitoutputs a changeover signal (for example, a low-level signal) forchanging the movable portion 54C of the changeover switch 54 to thefirst input 54A. The details of the determination unit 53 will bedescribed below.

[Restoration Filter]

Next, the restoration filter stored in the restoration filter storageunit 51B will be described.

In general, a convolution type Wiener filter can be used in therestoration of a blurred image using a point spread function (PSF)indicating a response to a point light source of the imaging opticalsystem (lens 16 and diaphragm 18). Frequency characteristics d(ωx, ωy)of the restoration filter can be calculated by the following expressionwhile referring to information of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and theoptical transfer function (OTF) obtained by performing the Fouriertransform on PSF(x, y).

$\begin{matrix}{{d\left( {\omega_{x},\omega_{y}} \right)} = \frac{H^{*}\left( {\omega_{x},\omega_{y}} \right)}{{{H\left( {\omega_{x},\omega_{y}} \right)}}^{2} + {{1/S}\; N\;{R\left( {\omega_{x},\omega_{y}} \right)}}}} & \left\lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 1} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

Here, H(ωx, ωy) represents the OTF, and H*(ωx, ωy) represents thecomplex conjugate thereof. SNR(ωx, ωy) represents a signal-to-noiseratio.

The design of a filter coefficient of the restoration filter has anoptimization problem that a coefficient value is selected such that thefrequency characteristics of the filter become closest to desired Wienerfrequency characteristics, and the filter coefficient can beappropriately calculated through any known method.

Since the PSF is changed by the imaging condition such as an F number, awavelength (peak wavelength) of illumination light, an image height, anda focal length, it is necessary to calculate the restoration filter byusing the PSF changed by the imaging condition. The restoration filtermay be calculated by using the modulation transfer function (MTF)indicating an amplitude component of the OTF instead of the OTF.

A plurality of restoration filters calculated depending on PSFscorresponding to a plurality of imaging conditions is stored inassociation with the imaging conditions in the restoration filterstorage unit 51B. Although the restoration filter storage unit 51B ofthe present example stores the restoration filter corresponding to the Fnumber of the diaphragm 18 and the kind of the light source of theillumination device 40 or the wavelength (peak wavelength) of the lightsource, the present invention is not limited thereto. The restorationfilter corresponding to the image height may be generated and stored.

Information (F number information) indicating a current F number of thediaphragm 18 and information (light source information) indicating thekind of the light source used at the time of imaging, among theplurality of light sources used by the illumination device 40, areapplied to the restoration filter selecting unit 51C from the cameracontroller 28 (FIG. 1), and the restoration filter selecting unit 51Creads out the restoration filter corresponding to the F numberinformation and the light source information from the restoration filterstorage unit 51B based on the F number information and the light sourceinformation input from the camera controller 28, and outputs the readoutrestoration filter to the restoration filter processing unit 51A. Thelight source information is not limited to the information indicatingthe kind of the light source used at the time of imaging, and may beinformation indicating the wavelength (peak wavelength) of the lightsource used at the time of imaging.

The F number information and the light source information are applied tothe determination unit 53 from the camera controller 28. Thedetermination unit 53 determines whether or not it is necessary toperform the point image restoration processing using the point imagerestoration processing unit 51 on the input image data based on the Fnumber information and the light source information, and outputs achangeover signal corresponding to the determination result to thechangeover switch 54 as described above.

Next, the detailed determination method of whether or not it isnecessary to perform the point image restoration processing on thecaptured image data will be described.

Resolution degradation (blur) of the captured image depends on the pointspread function (PSF) of the lens, and the PSF mainly depends on thespherical aberration of the lens.

The Zernike polynomial using polar coordinates is used as a polynomialthat approximates a wavefront aberration of the imaging optical system,and the ninth term of the Zernike polynomial (Frits Zernike polynomial)represents the spherical aberration.

The spherical aberration expressed by the ninth term of the FritsZernike polynomial and the MTF for each F number were calculated forvarious lenses having different spherical aberrations by using the lenshaving a focal length f of 16 mm and using the mercury lamp using thespectrum (wavelength λ=546.070 nm) of the e lines as the peak wavelengthas an illumination light source.

The sampling frequency (fs) of the imaging element 26 is 90 samples/mm,and the MTF is a value of a predetermined spatial frequency (0.25 fs inthe present example) in a range of 0.25 fs to 0.3 fs. The reason why theMTF in the spatial frequency in the range of 0.25 fs to 0.3 fs is usedas an evaluation target is that the MTF in the spatial frequency in sucha range is suitable to evaluate image quality and is a spatial frequencydomain in which the point image restoration processing contributes tothe image quality.

FIG. 4 is a chart showing an example of the MTF calculated for eachcombination of the spherical aberration and the F number.

FIG. 4 shows the MTF for each combination of ten kinds of lenses havingspherical aberrations of 0λ, 0.2λ, . . . , and 5λ and the F numbershaving ten steps of F1.4 to F22.

Here, the MTF shown in FIG. 4 is a value in the predetermined spatialfrequency (0.25 fs) on an optical axis and is the MTF in a predeterminedregion on an imaging screen of the imaging element 26, but may be avalue in the other region.

The MTF in the predetermined region may be the MTF in a region in whichthe image height on the imaging screen is equal to or greater than 50%(50% in a case where a distance from the center of the imaging screen tothe four corners of the imaging screen) is 100%). In general, the reasonis that since the MTF generally becomes smaller as the image heightbecomes higher, the MTF in this region is preferably employed.

As another example of the MTF in the predetermined region, the MTF onthe entire screen of the imaging screen may be employed, or MTFs at aplurality of optional points on the imaging screen may be employed.

A representative value (for example, average value, median value, ormode) of the MTF in the predetermined region is used as the MTF in thepredetermined region.

As shown in FIG. 4, F1.4 is the maximum F number. The MTF becomes largeras the F number becomes larger from the maximum F number (diaphragmopening becomes smaller), and the MTF becomes gradually smaller in acase where the F number is equal to or greater than F5.6. The reason whythe MTF becomes gradually smaller in a case where the F number is equalto or greater than F5.6 is that the small diaphragm blur is moredominant than the spherical aberration. Since the MTF is too small atF22, the MTF is not able to be correctly calculated, and thus, the MTFis set as 0.

FIG. 5 is a chart showing another example showing the MTF calculated foreach combination of the spherical aberration and the F number. The MTFshown in FIG. 5 is shown for a case where only the kind of the lightsource is different from that in the example shown in FIG. 4, and a casewhere the infrared light source having a wavelength (1092.14 nm) whichis two times the wavelength of the e lines shown in FIG. 4 as the peakwavelength is used as the light source of the illumination light isillustrated.

In a case where the wavelength of the light source is different, arefractive index of the lens is different, and thus, the MTF is alsodifferent. As can be seen from the comparison of the MTF shown in FIG. 4with the MTF shown in FIG. 5, in a case where the infrared light havingthe wavelength which is two times the wavelength of the e lines is usedas the light source at the time of imaging, the MTF is reduced comparedwith a case where the mercury lamp is used as the light source and thelight having the wavelength of the e lines as the peak wavelength isused. That is, the spherical aberration is different by a wavelength fordetermining the spherical aberration, and the longer the wavelength, thehigher the spherical aberration.

The imaging device 10 used in the machine vision system uses the rangeof the diaphragm for practical use due to the necessity of the depth offield, as the diaphragm having the mid-range, and the lens 16 isdesigned such that the captured image with the desired image qualityneeded in the inspection of the product is able to be obtained on thepreferential basis in the diaphragm having the mid-range even though thepoint image restoration processing is not performed.

Meanwhile, since the brightness of the lens is needed as the lensspecification, it is necessary to obtain the captured image with thedesired image quality needed in the inspection of the product even inthe full aperture, and the degraded captured image is recovered throughthe point image restoration processing in this case.

Although the lens 16 of the present example is designed such that thespherical aberration is 2λ, the present invention is not limitedthereto. As the lens has high spherical aberration, the lens is easilydesigned, and thus, the lens becomes cheap.

The determination unit 53 determines whether or not to perform the pointimage restoration processing using the point image restorationprocessing unit 51 based on the spherical aberration of the imagingoptical system changed depending on the imaging condition (F number andwavelength of light source). The reason is that since the PSF depends onthe spherical aberration and the MTF indicating the amplitude componentof the OTF obtained by performing the Fourier transform on the PSF alsodepends on the spherical aberration, the determination unit candetermine the resolution degradation (blur) of the captured image basedon the spherical aberration.

FIG. 6 is a longitudinal aberration diagram showing the sphericalaberration of a certain lens, and is shown as a graph of which ahorizontal axis represents a position in which a light ray crosses anoptical axis and a vertical axis represents a height at which the lightray is incident on the imaging optical system. An origin O of the graphis a paraxial image point for a wavelength for determining the sphericalaberration, and a side apart from the lens on the horizontal axis isassigned a plus symbol.

In the present example, the spherical aberration of the lens is anamount defined by a difference between an image surface position (aposition corresponding to a diaphragm diameter of 0) of the paraxial andan image surface position of the light ray passing through the most edgeside of an opening of an full aperture, and is evaluated by the sum of amaximum deviation (aberration amount) in a positive direction and amaximum deviation (aberration amount) in a minus direction in FIG. 6. InFIG. 6, the spherical aberration (aberration amount) is expressed by Ain a case where the F number is F1.4 (maximum F number), and thespherical aberrations (aberration amounts) in a case where the F numberis F1.8, F2, and F2.8 are respectively expressed by B1, B2, and B3. Thatis, the spherical aberration becomes maximum in a case where the Fnumber is F1.4 (maximum F number), and becomes smaller as the F numberis increased from the maximum F number.

In a case where the spherical aberration changed by the F number to beused is equal to or greater than a first threshold value (0.6λ in a casewhere the wavelength for determining the spherical aberration is λ inthe present example), the determination unit 53 determines to performthe point image restoration processing using the point image restorationprocessing unit 51. The reason why the first threshold value is set to0.6λ is that the lens of F1.4 has spherical aberration of 0.6λ or moreunder a condition in which the MTF is less than 50% on an open side in acase where the MTF is evaluated by using assuming the sphericalaberration expressed by the ninth term of the Frits Zernike polynomial,setting the sampling frequency (fs) of the imaging element 26 to 90samples/mm, and using the mercury lamp having the spectrum (wavelengthλ=546.070 nm) of the e lines as the peak wavelength as the illuminationlight source as shown in FIG. 4. The MTF of 50% is a threshold value ofwhether or not the image data satisfies the desired image quality neededin the inspection of the product.

As shown in FIG. 4, in a case where the lens 16 has spherical aberrationof 2λ at the maximum F number (F1.4) and the illumination light emittedfrom the illumination device 40 is light having the spectrum of the elines as the peak wavelength, if the F number of the diaphragm 18 is F2,the spherical aberration is less than 0.6λ, and the MTF satisfies 50%.

In a case where the F number of the diaphragm 18 is equal to or greaterthan F2 under such a condition, since the spherical aberration less than0.6λ and the MTF satisfies 50% (except for the decrease in the MTF dueto the diffraction caused by the small diaphragm), the determinationunit 53 determines not to perform the point image restoration processingin a case where the F number is equal to or greater than F2.

That is, the determination unit 53 can perform determination by usingthe F number instead of determining whether or not the point imagerestoration processing using the point image restoration processing unit51 based on the spherical aberration changed by the imaging condition (Fnumber and wavelength of light source). In the present example, thedetermination unit determines not to perform the point image restorationprocessing in a case where the F number is equal to or greater thanF2.0, and determines to perform the point image restoration processingin a case where the F number is less than F2.0. In the example shown inFIG. 4, since a case where the MTF is less than 50% at F11 or more iscaused by not the spherical aberration but the small diaphragm blur,this case is not considered in the present determination.

In a case where a ratio (spherical aberration ratio) of the sphericalaberration (second spherical aberration) of the imaging optical systemchanged by the imaging condition to the spherical aberration (firstspherical aberration) of the imaging optical system in a case where thediaphragm 18 is the full aperture (F1.4) exceeds 0.5, the determinationunit 53 may determine to perform the point image restoration processingusing the point image restoration processing unit 51.

As shown in FIG. 6, in a case where the first spherical aberration ofthe imaging optical system in the full aperture (F1.4) is A and thesecond spherical aberrations corresponding to the F numbers (F1.8, F2,F2.8, . . . ) to be used at the time of imaging are B1, B2, B3, . . . ,the spherical aberration ratios may be expressed by B1/A, B2/A, B3/A, .. . .

In a case where the spherical aberration ratio capable of being obtainedby the F number to be used at the time of imaging exceeds the thresholdvalue (second threshold value (0.5 in the present example)), the MTF isless than 50%, and thus, the determination unit 53 can determine toperform the point image restoration processing using the point imagerestoration processing unit 51.

Next, the second threshold value of the spherical aberration ratio asthe determination reference of whether or not the MTF is less than 50%will be described.

The ninth term of the Zernike polynomial (Frits Zernike polynomial)representing the spherical aberration is expressed by the followingexpression.R(ρ,θ)=6ρ⁴−6ρ²+1  [Expression 2]

In [Expression 2], ρ represents a radius, and θ represents an angle ofrotation.

Since the spherical aberration can approximate by the differentiation ofthe wavefront aberration, f is a focal length, and the sphericalaberration can be expressed by the following expression.Zdp(ρ)=f(24ρ³−12ρ)  [Expression 3]

In a case where the F number at the time of opening the diaphragm is F₀and the F number at the time of imaging is F, a pupil diameter L₀ at thetime of opening can be expressed by L₀=f/F₀, and a pupil diameter L atthe time of imaging can be expressed by L=f/F.

In a case where a ratio between the pupil diameters is T, the ratio Tbetween the pupil diameters can be expressed by the followingexpression.

$\begin{matrix}{T = \frac{{Zdp}(L)}{{Zdp}\left( L_{0} \right)}} & \left\lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 4} \right\rbrack\end{matrix}$

In a case where c is a constant depending on the focal length and[Expression 3] approximates, the spherical aberration can be expressedby the following expression.Zdp(ρ)≈c×ρ ³  [Expression 5]

Accordingly, the following expression is established by [Expression 4]and [Expression 5].

$\begin{matrix}{T = \left( {F_{0}/F} \right)^{3}} & \left\lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 6} \right\rbrack \\{or} & \; \\{F = \frac{F_{0}}{\sqrt[2]{T}}} & \;\end{matrix}$

That is, a case where the MTF is prescribed using the ratio (sphericalaberration ratio) between the spherical aberrations in the ninth term ofthe Zernike polynomial is equivalent to a case where the MTF isprescribed using the F number.

As stated above, T (the spherical aberration ratio which is the ratiobetween the spherical aberration at the maximum F number and thespherical aberration at the F number at the time of imaging) at whichthe MTF is less than 50% is calculated for each lens having differentspherical aberration shown in FIG. 4. The minimum spherical aberrationratio among the spherical aberration ratios at which the MTF is lessthan 50% is calculated for each lens. The MTF due to the diffractioncaused by the small diaphragm is decreased, and is calculated except forthe F number at which the MTF is less than 50%.

FIG. 7 is a chart showing the calculation result of the sphericalaberration ratio calculated for each lens having different sphericalaberration shown in FIG. 4.

In a case where the MTF is evaluated by setting the sampling frequency(fs) of the imaging element 26 to 90 samples/mm and using the mercurylamp having the spectrum (wavelength λ=546.070 nm) of the e lines as thepeak wavelength as the illumination light source as shown in FIG. 7, thespherical aberration ratio of the lens having spherical aberration of 2λat the maximum F number is 0.47 in a case where the MTF is less than50%.

Accordingly, 0.5 obtained by rounding off the second decimal place of0.47 is employed as the second threshold value of the sphericalaberration ratio as the determination reference of whether or not theMTF is less than 50%.

In the case of the lens 16 of the present example designed such that thespherical aberration is 2λ, in a case where the light source having thespectrum of the e lines as the peak wavelength is used and the F numberis reduced to F2, the MTF is equal to or greater than the thresholdvalue of 50%. However, in a case where the infrared light source thatemits the infrared light having the wavelength which is two times thewavelength of the e lines is used, since the MTF is not equal to orgreater than the threshold value of 50% even though the F number ischanged to F2, it is necessary to change the F number to F2.8 or more.

Accordingly, in a case where the determination unit 53 determineswhether or not to perform the point image restoration processing basedon the spherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by theimaging condition and the first threshold value or determines whether ornot to perform the point image restoration processing based on thespherical aberration ratio between the spherical aberration (firstspherical aberration) in the full aperture and the spherical aberration(second spherical aberration) of the imaging optical system changed bythe imaging condition and the second threshold value, it is preferablethat the first threshold value or the second threshold value setdepending on the wavelength (that is, the kind of the light source ofthe illumination light emitted from the illumination device 40 (or thewavelength of the light source)) for determining the sphericalaberration is used. In a case where the determination unit determineswhether or not to perform the point image restoration processing byusing the F number at the time of imaging, it is preferable that the Fnumber (threshold value) as the determination reference is also setdepending on the wavelength for determining the spherical aberration.

<Second Embodiment of Image Processing Unit>

FIG. 8 is a block diagram showing a second embodiment of the imageprocessing unit 35 in the camera controller 28 shown in FIG. 2. Portionsin common with those in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 3 will beassigned the same references, and the detailed description thereof willbe omitted.

The image processing unit 35 of the second embodiment shown in FIG. 8mainly includes a point image restoration processing unit 52, adetermination unit 53, and a changeover switch 54.

The point image restoration processing unit 52 is different from thepoint image restoration processing unit 51 of the image processing unit35 of the first embodiment in that a point spread function storage unit52B and a restoration filter generating unit 52C are provided instead ofthe restoration filter storage unit 51B and the restoration filterselecting unit 51C of the point image restoration processing unit 51.

The restoration filter storage unit 51B of the point image restorationprocessing unit 51 stores the plurality of restoration filterscorresponding to the imaging conditions such as the F number, whereasthe point spread function storage unit 52B stores the point spreadfunction (PSF) representing the response to the point light source ofthe imaging optical system (lens 16 and diaphragm 18) which is a sourcefor generating the plurality of restoration filters. The restorationfilter storage unit 51B may store the PSF corresponding to the imagingcondition only under the imaging condition in which the determinationunit determines to perform the point image restoration processing, andthus, the data amount of the PSF to be stored can be reduced.

The F number information indicating the current F number of thediaphragm 18 and the light source information indicating the kind of thelight source used at the time of imaging, among the plurality of lightsources used by the illumination device 40, are applied to therestoration filter generating unit 52C from the camera controller 28(FIG. 1), and the restoration filter generating unit 52C reads out thePSF corresponding to these information items from the point spreadfunction storage unit 52B based on the F number information and thelight source information input from the camera controller 28, andgenerates the restoration filter based on the readout PSF.

That is, the restoration filter generating unit 52C obtains thefrequency characteristics d(ωx, ωy) of the restoration filter asrepresented, for example, by [Expression 1] based on the OTF obtained byperforming the Fourier transform on the readout PSF and the preset SNR,and generates the convolution type Wiener filter (restoration filter) byperforming the inverse Fourier transform on the frequencycharacteristics.

The restoration filter created in this manner is applied to therestoration filter processing unit 52A, and the convolution operation ofthe image data and the restoration filter is performed.

Although the point spread function storage unit 52B stores the PSF, thepoint spread function storage unit may store the OTF obtained byperforming the Fourier transform on the PSF or the MTF indicating theamplitude component of the OTF instead of the PSF.

[Image Processing Method]

<First Embodiment of Image Processing Method>

Next, a first embodiment of an image processing method according to thepresent invention will be described according to a flowchart shown inFIG. 9.

In FIG. 9, the determination unit 53 (FIGS. 3 and 8) of the imageprocessing unit 35 obtains the imaging condition (the F numberinformation indicating the current F number of the diaphragm 18 and thelight source information indicating the kind of the light source used atthe time of imaging, among the plurality of light sources of theillumination device 40) from the camera controller 28 (step S10).

Subsequently, the determination unit 53 obtains the spherical aberrationof the imaging optical system (lens 16 and diaphragm 18) correspondingto the obtained imaging condition (step S12). For example, thedetermination unit 53 has a storage unit that stores the sphericalaberration for each kind (wavelength λ=546.070 nm or λ=1092.14 nm) ofthe light source used at the time of imaging as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5and for each F number corresponding to the spherical aberration (2λ) ofthe lens 16 of the present example, and obtains the spherical aberrationby reading out the spherical aberration corresponding to the currentimaging condition from the storage unit.

The determination unit 53 determines whether or not the sphericalaberration obtained as stated above is equal to or greater than thefirst threshold value (0.6λ), and determines to perform the point imagerestoration processing using the point image restoration processing unit51 or 52 (FIG. 3 or 8) in a case where the spherical aberration is equalto or greater than 0.6λ (in the case of “Yes”). The processing proceedsto step S16 (step S14). That is, in a case where the determination unit53 determines to perform the point image restoration processing, thedetermination unit causes the point image restoration processing unit 51or 52 to be operable, and outputs the changeover signal for changing themovable portion 54C of the changeover switch 54 to the second input 54B.

In step S16, the point image restoration processing unit 51 or 52performs the point image restoration processing only in a case where thedetermination unit 53 determines to perform the point image restorationprocessing, and outputs the image data obtained by performing the pointimage restoration processing to the second input 54B of the changeoverswitch 54. Accordingly, the image data on which the point imagerestoration processing is performed is output through the changeoverswitch 54.

Meanwhile, in a case where the obtained spherical aberration is lessthan the first threshold value (0.6λ) (in the case of “No”), thedetermination unit 53 determines not to perform the point imagerestoration processing using the point image restoration processing unit51 or 52, and the present processing is ended (step S14). In this case,the determination unit 53 outputs the changeover signal for changing themovable portion 54C of the changeover switch 54 to the first input 54A,and outputs unprocessed image data on which the point image restorationprocessing is not performed, which is input to the first input 54A,through the changeover switch 54. In a case where the determination unit53 determines not to perform the point image restoration processing, itis preferable that the determination unit causes the point imagerestoration processing unit 51 to 52 to be inoperable and theoperational costs can be reduced.

<Second Embodiment of Image Processing Method>

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing a second embodiment of the imageprocessing method according to the present invention. In FIG. 10, stepsin common with those in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 9 will beassigned the same step numbers, and the detailed description thereofwill be omitted.

Although it has been described in the first embodiment that thedetermination unit determines whether or not to perform the point imagerestoration processing based on the magnitude of the sphericalaberration, the second embodiment shown in FIG. 10 is different from thefirst embodiment in that the determination unit determines whether ornot to perform the point image restoration processing based on the Fnumber obtained in step S10 instead of the spherical aberration.

That is, the determination unit 53 of the second embodiment determineswhether or not the F number obtained in step S10 is equal to or greaterthan F2, and determines not to perform the point image restorationprocessing in a case where the F number is equal to or greater than F2(in the case of “Yes”). The present processing is ended (step S20).

Meanwhile, in a case where the F number obtained in step S10 is lessthan F2 (in the case of “No”), the determination unit 53 determines toperform the point image restoration processing. The processing proceedsto step S16 (step S20).

The F number determined in step S20 corresponds to a case where the kindof the light source is the mercury lamp (wavelength λ=546.070 nm) (seethe F number corresponding to the spherical aberration of 2λ in FIG. 4).In a case where the kind of the light source is the infrared lightsource (wavelength λ=1092.14 nm), F2.8 is used as the threshold valueinstead of F2 in step S20 (see the F number corresponding to thespherical aberration of 2λ in FIG. 5).

<Third Embodiment of Image Processing Method>

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing a third embodiment of the imageprocessing method according to the present invention. In FIG. 11, stepsin common with those in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 9 will beassigned the same step numbers, and the detailed description thereofwill be omitted.

In FIG. 11, the determination unit 53 of the third embodiment obtainsthe spherical aberration ratio which is the ratio of the secondspherical aberration (determined by the F number and the kind(wavelength) of the light source obtained in step S10) of the imagingoptical system at the time of imaging to the first spherical aberration(determined by the kind (wavelength) of the light source obtained instep S10) of the imaging optical system in a case where the diaphragm isthe full aperture (maximum F number) (step S22).

Subsequently, the determination unit 53 determines whether or not thespherical aberration ratio obtained in step S22 exceeds the secondthreshold value (0.5), and determines to perform the point imagerestoration processing in a case where the spherical aberration ratioexceeds 0.5 (in the case of “Yes”). The processing proceeds to step S16(step S24). The reason is that in a case where the spherical aberrationratio exceeds 0.5 and the lens 16 has spherical aberration of 2λ at thetime of opening, the MTF is less than 50% and the image data does notsatisfy the desired image quality needed in the inspection of theproduct.

Meanwhile, in a case where the spherical aberration ratio obtained instep S22 is equal to or less than 0.5 (in the case of “No”), thedetermination unit 53 determines not to perform the point imagerestoration processing. The present processing is ended (step S24). In acase where the spherical aberration ratio is equal to or less than 0.5and the lens 16 has spherical aberration of 2λ at the time of opening,since the MTF is equal to or greater than 50% and the image datasatisfies the desired image quality, it is not necessary to perform thepoint image restoration processing.

[Others]

Although the imaging device 10 used in the machine vision system hasbeen described in the present embodiment, the purpose of the imagingdevice 10 is not limited to the purpose of the machine vision. Theimaging device may be applied to a general digital camera, digital videocamera, and surveillance camera, and an effect may be acquired by usinga camera which is frequently used in the range of the F number in whichthe small diaphragm blur does not occur.

Although it has been described in the present embodiment that the imageprocessing unit 35 (FIGS. 2, 3, and 8) in the camera controller 28 ofthe imaging device 10 functions as the image processing device accordingto the present invention, the present invention is not limited thereto.In a case where the RAW data is transmitted to the computer 60 from theimaging device 10, the image processing unit (image processing device)of the computer 60 may be the image processing unit of the computer 60so as to function as the image processing unit 35 in the cameracontroller 28. In this case, in a case where the computer 60 does notcontrol the imaging condition through the camera controller 28, thecamera controller 28 needs to transmit the RAW data and the imagingcondition such as the F number at the time of imaging to the imageprocessing unit of the computer 60.

Although the point image restoration processing of the presentembodiment uses the convolution type Wiener filter as the restorationfilter, the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, therestoration filter in the spatial frequency domain shown in [Expression1] may be used. In this case, it is necessary that the Fourier transformis performed on the input image data, the image data in the spatialfrequency domain on which the Fourier transform is performed and therestoration filter in the spatial frequency domain are multiplied, andthe inverse Fourier transform is performed on the multiplied result.

The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments,and may be modified without departing from the spirit of the presentinvention.

EXPLANATION OF REFERENCES

-   -   10: imaging device    -   12: lens unit    -   16: lens    -   18: diaphragm    -   20: optical system operating unit    -   26: imaging element    -   28: camera controller    -   32: input and output interface    -   34: device controller    -   35: image processing unit    -   40: illumination device    -   51, 52: point image restoration processing unit    -   51A, 52A: restoration filter processing unit    -   51B: restoration filter storage unit    -   51C: restoration filter selecting unit    -   52B: point spread function storage unit    -   52C: restoration filter generating unit    -   53: determination unit    -   54: changeover switch    -   54A: first input    -   54B: second input    -   54C: movable portion    -   60: computer    -   62: computer input and output unit    -   64: computer controller    -   66: display    -   S10 to S24: step    -   f: focal length    -   λ: wavelength    -   F₀: maximum F number    -   F: F number at the time of imaging    -   L₀: pupil diameter at the time of opening    -   L: pupil diameter at the time of imaging    -   T: ratio of pupil diameter

What is claimed is:
 1. An image processing device comprising: processingcircuitry configured to: perform point image restoration processingusing a restoration filter based on a point spread function of animaging optical system on image data obtained from an imaging elementthrough imaging of a subject using an imaging unit having the imagingoptical system and the imaging element; and determine whether or not toperform the point image restoration processing based on sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system changed by an imagingcondition, wherein the processing circuitry performs the point imagerestoration processing only in a case where it is determined by theprocessing circuitry to perform the point image restoration processing,wherein a first spherical aberration is a spherical aberration of theimage optical system in a case where a diaphragm constituting the imageoptical system is a full aperture, wherein a second spherical aberrationis a spherical aberration of the imaging optical system that is changedby the imaging condition, and wherein, if a ratio of the secondspherical aberration to the first spherical aberration exceeds a secondthreshold value, the processing circuitry determines to perform thepoint image restoration processing.
 2. The image processing deviceaccording to claim 1, wherein the imaging condition is an F number of adiaphragm constituting the imaging optical system.
 3. The imageprocessing device according to claim 2, wherein the processing circuitrydetermines whether or not to perform the point image restorationprocessing using the processing circuitry based on the F number of thediaphragm.
 4. The image processing device according to claim 1, wherein,in a case where the spherical aberration of the imaging optical systemchanged by the imaging condition is equal to or greater than a firstthreshold value, the processing circuitry determines to perform thepoint image restoration processing using the processing circuitry. 5.The image processing device according to claim 4, wherein, in a casewhere a wavelength for determining the spherical aberration is λ, thefirst threshold value is 0.6λ.
 6. The image processing device accordingto claim 1, wherein the second threshold value is 0.5.
 7. The imageprocessing device according to claim 1, wherein the imaging condition isa kind of a light source that illuminates the subject or a wavelength ofthe light source.
 8. The image processing device according to claim 7,wherein the processing circuitry uses the spherical aberrationcorresponding to the kind of the light source that illuminates thesubject or the wavelength of the light source, as the sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system changed by the imagingcondition.
 9. The image processing device according to claim 1, wherein,in a case where the diaphragm constituting the imaging optical system isat least an full aperture, the imaging optical system has the sphericalaberration at which the processing circuitry determines to perform thepoint image restoration processing.
 10. An imaging device comprising:the image processing device according to claim 1; and the imaging unit.11. The imaging device according to claim 10, wherein the imaging deviceis used as an industrial camera.
 12. An image processing methodcomprising: a step of performing point image restoration processingusing a restoration filter based on a point spread function of animaging optical system on image data obtained from an imaging elementthrough imaging of a subject using an imaging unit having the imagingoptical system and the imaging element; and a step of determiningwhether or not to perform the point image restoration processing basedon spherical aberration of the imaging optical system changed by animaging condition, wherein, in the step of performing the point imagerestoration processing, the point image restoration processing using arestoration filter is performed only in a case where it is determined toperform the point image restoration processing, wherein a firstspherical aberration is a spherical aberration of the image opticalsystem in a case where a diaphragm constituting the image optical systemis a full aperture, wherein a second spherical aberration is a sphericalaberration of the imaging optical system that is changed by the imagingcondition, and wherein, in the step of determining whether or not toperform the point image restoration processing, if a ratio of the secondspherical aberration to the first spherical aberration exceeds a secondthreshold value, it is determined to perform the point image restorationprocessing.
 13. The image processing method according to claim 12,wherein the imaging condition is an F number of a diaphragm constitutingthe imaging optical system.
 14. The image processing method according toclaim 13, wherein, in the step of determining whether or not to performthe point image restoration processing, it is determined to whether ornot to perform the point image restoration processing based on the Fnumber of the diaphragm.
 15. The image processing method according toclaim 12, wherein, in a case where the spherical aberration of theimaging optical system changed by the imaging condition is equal to orgreater than a first threshold value, it is determined to perform thepoint image restoration processing in the step of determining whether ornot to perform the point image restoration processing.
 16. The imageprocessing method according to claim 15, wherein, in a case where awavelength for determining the spherical aberration is λ, the firstthreshold value is 0.6λ.
 17. The image processing method according toclaim 12, wherein the second threshold value is 0.5.